Act on the old-age insurance
Official title: Änderung des Bundesgesetzes über die Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung (AHVG) (AHV 21)
Women and men get the same retirement age of 65; the women’s age rises step by step from 64 to 65. Compensation measures and more flexible retirement are added.
This summary was written by an AI from the official documents; a second AI checked it sentence by sentence. How we use AI
Result: Accepted
50.6% yes
- Turnout 52.2%
Source: Federal Statistical Office (FSO)
Result by canton
Yes majority in 16 of 26 cantons, sorted by yes share.
Choose a canton on the map or in the list to see how its municipalities voted.
- ZugYes majority, Yes share 65.0%, Turnout 58%
- NidwaldenYes majority, Yes share 64.7%, Turnout 57%
- Appenzell InnerrhodenYes majority, Yes share 64.5%, Turnout 52%
- ObwaldenYes majority, Yes share 60.8%, Turnout 59%
- SchwyzYes majority, Yes share 60.5%, Turnout 57%
- LucerneYes majority, Yes share 59.4%, Turnout 56%
- Appenzell AusserrhodenYes majority, Yes share 59.0%, Turnout 56%
- St. GallenYes majority, Yes share 57.7%, Turnout 51%
- ThurgauYes majority, Yes share 57.7%, Turnout 52%
- UriYes majority, Yes share 57.1%, Turnout 50%
- GraubündenYes majority, Yes share 56.2%, Turnout 49%
- ZurichYes majority, Yes share 55.8%, Turnout 51%
- AargauYes majority, Yes share 55.4%, Turnout 50%
- GlarusYes majority, Yes share 51.8%, Turnout 46%
- Basel-LandschaftYes majority, Yes share 51.0%, Turnout 52%
- BernYes majority, Yes share 50.4%, Turnout 54%
- SchaffhausenNo majority, Yes share 50.0%, Turnout 68%
- SolothurnNo majority, Yes share 49.8%, Turnout 51%
- Basel-StadtNo majority, Yes share 46.8%, Turnout 54%
- ValaisNo majority, Yes share 45.0%, Turnout 50%
- TicinoNo majority, Yes share 42.9%, Turnout 52%
- FribourgNo majority, Yes share 39.5%, Turnout 53%
- VaudNo majority, Yes share 37.9%, Turnout 53%
- GenevaNo majority, Yes share 37.2%, Turnout 47%
- NeuchâtelNo majority, Yes share 35.5%, Turnout 48%
- JuraNo majority, Yes share 29.1%, Turnout 53%
✓ Yes majority · ✗ No majority · Turnout %
Sources: Federal Statistical Office (FSO); older votes: Swissvotes, Année Politique Suisse, University of Bern; map base: FSO, GEOSTAT
By language region
Yes share of the cantons, added up by their majority language.
- German-speaking54.9% yes
- French-speaking38.7% yes
- Ticino42.9% yes
Cantons by their majority language: Fribourg and Valais count as French-speaking, Bern and Graubünden as German-speaking.
Yes or no?
What changes if YES wins?
The AHV law is changed: women and men have the same reference age of 65, and the women’s age rises step by step from 64 to 65. There are compensation measures for those born 1961 to 1969 and more flexible retirement.
What changes if NO wins?
The AHV law stays as it is and the women’s retirement age stays at 64. Because the proposals are linked, the Federal Council says the VAT increase and thus the whole reform fail too.
At a glance
- Type of proposal
- Optional referendum
- Needed to pass
- A majority of voters
- Federal Council recommends
- Yes
- Topics
- Social policy
What exactly is it about?
The AHV is the state pension insurance. According to the Federal Council, its income will soon no longer be enough to pay all pensions: more people are retiring and pensions are paid for ever longer. The law is the second part of the AHV 21 reform and is linked to the VAT increase. If either of the two proposals is rejected, the whole reform fails. The law introduces the same retirement age of 65 for women and men, now called the “reference age”. The women’s age rises from 64 to 65 in four steps. Women born between 1961 and 1969 receive compensation measures: those who draw their pension early face a smaller reduction, and those who do not draw it early receive a supplement of 12.50 to 160 francs a month. The pension can be drawn between ages 63 and 70, also only in part. Those who work beyond 65 can, under certain conditions, improve their pension. Parliament has passed the law. Because a referendum was called against it, the voters decide on it. Only a majority of the voters is needed.
What is disputed?
The Federal Council and Parliament recommend a yes. They see the reform as a compromise between extra income and savings that secures pensions for about ten years. They consider aligning the retirement age justified, because women are better educated than before, mostly work and live longer than men; compensation measures cushion the increase. They point to the incentive to work longer, to more flexible retirement, and to the fact that waiting makes the reform costlier for future generations. The referendum committee recommends a no. It argues that the reform saves one-sidedly at the expense of women, who already receive pensions a third lower. It adds that retirement age 67 for everyone is already on the agenda. Older job seekers have poor chances, it says, and more people end up in long-term unemployment or on social assistance. It states that the AHV is sound and that the gloomy forecasts never came true.
Party recommendations
Recommend Yes
SVP Swiss People's Party
Mitte The Centre
FDP FDP.The Liberals
GLP Green Liberal Party of Switzerland
EDU Federal Democratic Union
EVP Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland
Recommend No
SP Social Democratic Party of Switzerland
GPS Green Party of Switzerland
Ordered by seats in the National Council (2023 election).
Similar votes
Earlier proposals where the cantons voted most alike. Each box is a canton, in the same order as for this proposal.
✓ Yes majority✗ No majority
This proposal
- Revision of the Unemployment Insurance Act
26 September 2010 · ✓ Accepted · 24 of 26 cantons the same
- Finanzierung der Arbeitslosenversicherung
28 September 1997 · ✗ Rejected · 24 of 26 cantons the same
- Asylum Act
9 June 2013 · ✓ Accepted · 16 of 26 cantons the same
- Ausländergesetz
24 September 2006 · ✓ Accepted · 16 of 26 cantons the same
Official resources
- Änderung des Bundesgesetzes über die Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung (AHVG) (AHV 21)
- VoteInfo (federal)
- smartvote
Vote data: Swissvotes – Année Politique Suisse, University of Bern (CC BY 4.0), and the Federal Statistical Office.